Saturday 29 September 2012

Kerala farmer Bava Moopen is the biggest beetel leaf exporter to Pakistan

When Kuwait Airways started freighter operations from Bangalore they were keen to use this service to carry betel-leaves (pan) to Karachi. The exporter was willing to pay INR 100 (the rate to West Europe then was 70 with no surcharges) per kilo.
Click to read
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/et-cetera/kerala-farmer-bava-moopen-is-the-biggest-beetel-leaf-exporter-to-pakistan/articleshow/16595251.cms

Friday 21 September 2012

Inside the world's most advanced submarine by Daniel Terdiman July 19, 2010 plus one more article on the same subject


Click to read
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-20010868-52/inside-the-worlds-most-advanced-submarine/

  World's most sophisticated and powerful nuclear submarine
  • Carries dozens of cruise missiles capable of hitting targets 1,200 miles away
  • Her sonar can detect vessels moving on the other side of the ocean
  • Powerful nuclear reactor allows her to cruise non-stop for 25 years
  • HMS Ambush is so hi-tech the giant submarine doesn't even need a periscope
By Sam Adams
PUBLISHED: 08:59 GMT, 14 September 2012 | UPDATED: 12:59 GMT, 14 September 201
She cost around £1billion to build, has sonar so sensitive it can hear other vessels 3,000 miles away and carries a giant payload of 38 deadly Tomahawk cruise missiles.
HMS Ambush, the Royal Navy's newest nuclear attack submarine, is one of the most sophisticated and powerful vessels of her type ever built.
The giant Astute-class sub, which was launched today, is so hi-tech she doesn't even need a periscope.
Scroll down to watch the submarine's weapons being tested...
Her crew instead using a digital camera system to see above the surface when she is submerged.
Built by BAE Systems, she has enough nuclear fuel to carry on cruising for up to 25 years non-stop - giving her huge tactical flexibility.
Her nuclear reactor is so powerful her range is only really limited by the need for maintenance and resupply.
Astute-class submarines are the largest, most advanced and most powerful in the history of the Navy, boasting world-class design, weaponry and versatility.
HMS Ambush can travel over 500 miles in a day, allowing them to be deployed anywhere in the world within two weeks. 
The vessel is also one of the quietest sea-going vessels built, capable of sneaking along an enemy coastline to drop off special forces or tracking a boat for weeks. 
Foreign forces will find it almost impossible to sneak up undetected by her incredibly powerful sonar equipment that can hear halfway around the world.
Her Tomahawk missiles are capable of hitting targets up to 1,200 miles away - making her a vital weapon for Britain's armed forces.
The sub's commander Peter Green, 47, said the vessel's capabilities are 'unparalleled.'
'This sub is a huge step forward in underwater operations,' he told the Daily Mirror.
'Her listening ability is quite awesome. She has a sonar system with the processing power of 2,000 laptop computers.
'It is possible this class of submarine is the most advanced in the world.'
Another Astute Class sub is currently undergoing sea trials – and could be operational within a year.
Many details of HMS Ambush's weapons systems cannot be revealed for security reasons.
Most of her 103-strong crew live in bunk-beds measuring two metres by one metre, with up to 18 submariners sharing one room.
After today's launch HMS Ambush will begin sea trials before eventually beginning operations.




Thursday 20 September 2012

India Rated Worst Asian Country for Entrepreneurship: 6 Reasons Say Why By SiliconIndia | Wednesday, 19 September 2012, 16:51 IST |

(I have quoted from the article with my comments being in a slightly bigger font)

Bangalore: India known for its talent tank, most of them who work for big organizations like NASA, Microsoft and the tech bellwethers and manufacturing giants it has produced over the years. Though India has seen many entrepreneurial ventures, it is still the worst for entrepreneurship in Asia, according to a Gallup poll. The reasons behind this are pointed to be widespread corruption, government hurdles, lack of funding and poor technology and training, which results in low efficiency and high start-up costs in India. So what are the major factors that let down India in this poll? Let’s take a sneak peak

The so-called “talent tank” has been created nor because of but in spite of the education system.  Other than a miniscule number of educational institutions quality education is unknown in India.  You start with a headline and the cite organisations like NASA, Microsoft, etc. People working in these “tech bellwethers” were never interested in entrepreneurship in the first place.  So, please don’t cite them as examples.  The reason why you see so many people in these organisations is because of the population and the high number of graduates being churned out by degree factories (I refuse to call them universities) each year.  

The number that represents those working in big US organisations is a very tiny percentage of the Indian graduate (I refuse to use the word educated) community which is but a microscopic percentage of the nation’s population.

Widespread corruption, government hurdles and other factors mentioned are facts that haven’t deterred entrepreneurs from starting and running very successful businesses.  The only country in the World having a greater percentage of its population engaged in entrepreneurship activities is Thailand.  This makes India the nation with the largest population of entrepreneurs in the World.  Gallup should be looking at the United States where the number of entrepreneurs are actually coming down and ask why that is happening.  Maybe corrective measures need to be taken there.

Willingness to take the risk of running a business is not a common trait among Indians
Qualities required in 
entrepreneurs such as business thinking, optimism and persistence are common among Indians. But the most important part which is the willingness to take the risk of running a business is rare.

As I stated earlier, India has more entrepreneurs than any other country in the World.  An aversion to risk would not have lead to this.

The report said, “More than 60% of the Indian population possesses personality traits that are crucial for success as an entrepreneur - such as business thinking (69%), optimism (66%), and persistence (65%) - which suggests a wealth of entrepreneurial capacity. However, willingness to take the risk of running a business is not a common trait among a majority of Indians.”
Isn’t that so contradictory?  I just need to repeat what I said in the previous paragraph.

Reliable support from honest and efficient government institutions is essential
According to the poll, around 46 percent of Indians say the government is the biggest hindrance in 
starting a business.  More than seventy percent believed corruption is widespread in the government.  More than sixty percent agreed that corruption is widespread in business. This view was particularly high among current business owners (72 percent) and those planning to start a business in the next 12 months (80 percent).
Who exactly has been polled?  Tell me, how many of those polled wanted to be entrepreneurs in the first place?  While corruption in government is a fact that can’t be wished away, there is much more corruption in private and non-government public life.  Has this stopped the entrepreneurial class?  Has it deterred determined start-ups?  The fact that “corruption is widespread in business” has spurred rather than held back a lot of would-be entrepreneurs.

Entrepreneurs need more diversified, localized funding at the initial stage
The most helpful factor in becoming an entrepreneur in India is access to financial support. The study said, “The key problem for entrepreneurs seems to be less about the availability of funding and more about finding the right type of funding.
Again another great fallacy.  I know of communities that fund start-ups for fellow community members almost at the drop of a hat.  People who don’t belong to these communities also have access to funds.  Sometimes, it may take a little time to get to know about these sources.  Please tell me about a viable venture that has not taken off because of lack of funds.

The majority of existing venture capital funds for start-ups are focused on export-oriented IT or mobile solutions.” There are only very few venture capital funds facilitating startups that offer the high-demand products and services in the healthcare or energy sectors in India's massive domestic market.
This is perhaps the only factual statement in this study.  However, funds are available of every sector.

Foreign investors need to understand India's business culture
Another problem with funding is that the foreign investors pay no attention to India's unique market demands, talent supply and business culture. They often make wrong assumptions based on what has worked well in their home countries.
Additionally, in Indian startups there is a lack of angel funding and investor participation in companies’ management. Venture capitalists in India prefer to only finance expansion of existing businesses, rather than funding a start-up from scratch.
What exactly are the pollsters trying to say in this statement?  Tell me, where can you do business without understanding the culture of that place?

Indian entrepreneurs need more access to training and mentorship
The report also said that only 22 percent of Indians who plan to start their business in the next 12 months have access to formal or informal training to 
start a business - which is much lower than the Asia average of 44 percent. Also there are not many entrepreneurs who offer their success stories for the young entrepreneurs to learn.
Almost every management institute has a so-called entrepreneurship cell.  The problem is that people manning them are not capable of any kind of assistance.  Tell me, which entrepreneurship venture has been stopped because those who wanted to start it lacked training?

Finding trusted partners is another big problem
According to the survey, only 16 percent of Indians say that a non-relative can be a trusted business partner. Also there is a lack of judicial infrastructure to protect the trusting relationship between entrepreneurs and business partners or between entrepreneurs and customers.
A great fallacy to conclude.



Click here to read the original article
http://www.siliconindia.com/news/startups/India-Rated-Worst-Asian-Country-for-Entrepreneurship-6-Reasons-Say-Why-nid-129624-cid-100.html?utm_campaign=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_source=r2

Foreign direct investment seen booster for aviation sector NIVEDITA GANGULY

Monday 17 September 2012

Kerala unveils plans for multimodal system N.K. KURUP SAJEEV KUMAR

River routes become attractive for moving coal SANTANU SANYAL

Full-fledged air cargo hub in the making AMIT MITRA

Foreign investment in aviation unlikely to soar for now NIVEDITA GANGULY

FDI may benefit but low taxes, infra costs need of hour: IATA PTI

Monday 10 September 2012

Photos: First wing for Airbus A350 XWB arrives at Toulouse assembly line Monday, September 10, 2012 by Devesh Agarwal

CARGO E-CHARTBOOK Q3 2012 OVERVIEW - IATA

What ails mainstream education and some remedies - Archie D'Souza - upadted today

Cabotage norms relaxed for Vallarpadam terminal Two contrary views on the same page of Business Line

This is an earlier post that I'm reposting with certain additions
http://sunriseacademyonline.blogspot.in/2012/09/cabotage-norms-relaxed-for-vallarpadam.html

Friday 7 September 2012

Industry hails Cabotage exemption to Vallarpadam terminal SAJEEV KUMAR V

A ship anchored at the Vallarpadam terminal 
Click to read
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/logistics/article3871166.ece

Qantas agrees to alliance with Emirates, no equity stake - Reuters / Sydney Sep 06, 2012, 10:51 IST

Tol replace Singapore with Dubai as hub for European flights, coordinate pricing and sales with Emirates 
Click to read
Click to watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei4_0EK4xrg&list=UUUS_IE2XRoSvAiaKzOql21g&index=0&feature=plcp

Video: The making of Air India's Boeing 787 Dreamliner Friday, September 07, 2012 by Devesh Agarwal

Air India to hive off engg, transport services

Cabotage norms relaxed for Vallarpadam terminal

Two contrary views on the same page of Business Line

“It is a good news and the Government has taken the right decision. As you know, huge investments have gone into the project, not from us alone. The Government also invested a lot. Erosion of these investments hurt all stakeholders,” said Singh (CEO ICTT), who lobbied to convince the Government on the need to ease cabotage.
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/logistics/article3877926.ece


Cabotage is a well thought law that is prevalent in most developed and free countries. The relaxation of Cabotage, now being called for container trade, is in our national interest. The reasoning that is extended is that there is inadequate Indian tonnage to meet the demand.
However, the fact is to the contrary. The Indian tonnage that is deployed in the coastal traffic is manifold in capacity than the feeder volumes that is on offer. With the deployment of OEL Kochi by us, the capacity of Indian vessels has gone up further.
Indian ship owners are ready and willing to deploy additional tonnage, once the volume offered justifies it. The present Cabotage law, as per Merchant Shipping Act, also allows deploying foreign tonnage by Indian ship owners if Director General of Shipping permits. It is not that we are opposed to easing of Cabotage, but we are firm that there is no need for it.
Today, a monthly capacity of 42,900 TEUs is being provided by Indian flag vessels calling at Kochi. However, the total transhipment cargo carried from Kochi is about 2,500 TEUs. Indian flag ships are also carrying a transhipment volume of about 5,000 TEUs from east coast.
RAMESH. S. RAMAKRISHNAN, CHAIRMAN, SHREYAS SHIPPING
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/logistics/article3877927.ece

Click to read
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/logistics/article3866769.ece

I had written earlier on this subject.  Please click on the link below to read - AD http://sunriseacademyonline.blogspot.in/2012/04/relaxation-of-cabotage-rules-how-will.html

Thursday 6 September 2012

Aerofex Hoverbike, Yes It's real.




Click to see
http://in.news.yahoo.com/photos/hover-vehicle-flies-into-future-1346910625-slideshow/

Wednesday 5 September 2012

IndiGo to launch four additional flights from Mumbai

Air Asia offers more flights between Tiruchi and Kuala Lumpur PTI

Analysis: Indian carriers get new international flying rights Thursday, September 06, 2012 by Vinay Bhaskara

World’s 10 best low cost airlines


Skytrax world airline survey recently measured and recognized passenger satisfaction across more than 38 key performance indicators of airline front-line product and service, including check-in, boarding, onboard seat comfort, cabin cleanliness, food, beverages, in-flight entertainment and staff service. Here’s a list of the world's 10 best low-cost airlines



Click to read
http://in.finance.yahoo.com/photos/world-s-10-best-low-cost-airlines-1346754080-slideshow/;_ylt=As9B7Kh4HDchM6kK9reouE3xULlG;_ylu=X3oDMTM3dGZkM21sBG1pdAMEcGtnA2IzNzk2MjQ3LTJkNjctM2FmMi04ZTY4LTNlNzRkMzdlYzMxMgRwb3MDNARzZWMDZW5kX3NzBHZlcgNiYmU3Yzc5Mi1mNzRjLTExZTEtOWY0OS1iYmE4YzRmYTI2M2Y-;_ylv=3

The Oceans of the World Who owns and controls them?


By Archie D’Souza
International trade and the movement of people are as old as civilization itself or perhaps precede it (or rather what the West perceives it to be).  Ancient peoples from India, Polynesia, and a few other parts of the World, learnt to use the stars to navigate.  During that period, though, the concept of nationhood didn’t exist and sovereignty didn’t extend beyond a very small area.  Even where empires existed, kings and lords still held domain over the areas they controlled and as long as they paid their tributes to the emperors’ representatives they were allowed to exist.  In other words, they controlled the land and perhaps inland waters.  Control and ownership of seas and oceans was still unknown.  At the most they held sway over coastal areas.

Since the start of the colonial era and more so after the end of WWII, the control and ownership of the oceans has long been a controversial topic.  The expansion of maritime trade also played an important part in giving a role to the oceans in controlling resources.  Once the Europeans began to sail and trade over the seas, and colonize the World, command of coastal areas suddenly became important.  Prior to European expansionism and the looting that went with it, the most prosperous nations were in the east, with India and China in top place.  Neither of these nations saw the need of powerful navies and control of the sea routes.  While the Romans and Egyptians did have navies, their reach didn’t extend beyond their coasts.  India was ruled from Delhi by the Mughal emperor.  While, the Marathas and others did have navies, these were not international.  There is a theory and I concur with it that because the Mughals, who ruled most of pre-colonial India, neglected the oceans, the vacuum was filled by the British.  If India and China had really powerful navies of their own, the Europeans would never succeed in their colonial ambitions.

The question today is – who controls the oceans or owns them?  Till the twentieth century no one really bothered.  Once the colonial powers began to lose their grip, countries began to come together to discuss a standardization of maritime boundaries.  However, till today the situation has yet to be resolved.
While in ancient times the rulers of kingdoms and empires didn’t bother that much, a few did unilaterally establish maritime borders.  By the 1950s though, all countries established the limits of their jurisdiction at sea on their own.  Most of them established a distance of 3 nautical miles as their borders.  However, some went beyond and claimed more.  Once they proclaimed these as their territorial waters, they considered them to be part of each country’s jurisdictions.  These areas were subject to all of the laws of the land of that country.  From the third to the fifth decades of the last century governments, especially the World’s big powers began to realize the value of mineral and oil resources under the oceans.  This led individual countries to start expanding their claims to the ocean for economic development.  They called this their exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

An EEZ may be defined as UN-granted rights and responsibilities of coastal states to control, exploit, manage, and conserve the living and non-living resources of the sea up to 200 nautical miles (322 Km) off their coasts, while allowing freedom of navigation to other states beyond 20 nautical miles of their coasts.  In other words, it is the maritime zone adjacent to the territorial sea that may not extend beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured.  Within the EEZ, the coastal State has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing natural resources, both living and nonliving, of the seabed, subsoil, and the subjacent waters and, with regard to other activities, for the economic exploitation and exploration of the zone (e.g., the production of energy from the water, currents, and winds).  Within the EEZ, the coastal State has jurisdiction with regard to establishing and using artificial islands, installations, and structures having economic purposes as well as for marine scientific research and the protection and preservation of the marine environment.  Other States may, however, exercise traditional high seas freedoms of navigation, over-flight, and related freedoms, such as conducting military exercises in the EEZ.  Click on the link below for the text of the UN Convention on the subject.


These applications are not universal, however.  The Americans interpret things differently.  In 1945, the US President Harry Truman claimed the entire continental shelf off the coasts of the United States.  This extends almost 200 nm off the Atlantic coast.  Similarly, in 1952, Chile, Peru, and Ecuador claimed a zone 200 nm from their shores.  These unilateral announcements made the international community realize that water borders need to be standardized.  Therefore the first UN Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS I) was convened and met in 1958.  Its main purpose was to discuss these and other oceanic issues.  It didn’t result in a treaty.  So, UNCLOS II and III were held and in 1960 and 1973 respectively.

UNCLOS III was followed by a treaty.  It, among other things, attempted to tackle the boundary issue.  The treaty specified that all coastal countries would have a 12 nm territorial sea and a 200 nm Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).  Within a country’s territorial waters, the law of the land applies.  Each country would control the economic exploitation and environmental quality of their EEZ.  In other words, now the exclusive economic zones are the areas in the seas/oceans where other coastal nations have jurisdiction over economic and resource management.  Coastal States are responsible for inshore waters out to three nm (five kilometres) of the coast.

Though the treaty has yet to be ratified or signed by some nations, most countries are adhering to its guidelines and have begun to consider themselves as having jurisdiction over a 200 nm domain.  According to reports these territorial seas and EEZs occupy approximately one-third of the world ocean.  This leaves two-thirds as high-seas or international waters.  What happens when two countries lie closer than 400 nm apart?  In such a case an EEZ boundary must be drawn between the countries.  When countries are closer than 24 nm apart a median line boundary needs to be drawn between each other's territorial waters.  UNCLOS protects the right of passage and even flight through and over narrow waterways.  These are known as chokepoints.
Many of the old colonial powers like Britain and France still continue to control many small Pacific and Atlantic islands, especially the former.  Britain insists that the Argentinean Falkland Islands is their sovereign territory.  So, we have millions of square kilometres in potentially profitable ocean area under their control.  Another issue in this regard is determining what constitutes enough of an area for an island to have its own EEZ.  UNCLOS says that an island must remain above the water line during high tide and may not just be rocks.  It must also be habitable for humans.  Several issues need to be sorted out regarding the political geography of the oceans.  However, it seems that most countries are following the recommendations of the 1982 treaty.  

This should limit, if not eliminate, most arguments over control of the sea.

Tuesday 4 September 2012

4 SEP, 2012, 03.32PM IST, REUTERS India will need 1,450 planes over next 20 years: Boeing

INDIA’S FIRST AEW&C AIRCRAFT MODIFIED AND FITTED WITH DRDO’S INDIGENOUS SYSTEMS LANDS ON INDIAN SOIL New Delhi: Bhadrapada 02, 1934 August 24, 2012

How Open-skies will benefit the Indian Economy - ARCHIE D'SOUZA


A news report in the Business Line of AUG 11 stated that the Aviation Ministry has asked domestic carriers to file plans of overseas flights.  According to the report the ministry is against allowing international airlines operating more flights into India till domestic carriers catch up.  Fifteen days were given to the domestic airlines to file their plans for international operations till March, 2014 and these fifteen days are over now.  The ministry’s reasoning is that if foreign airlines keep operating additional flights the Indian carriers have no chance to grow.  Is an open-skies policy bad for the Indian Aviation industry in particular and the Economy in general?  Let us see.
Today, five Indian carriers Air India (AI), Jet Airways, IndiGo, SpiceJet and Kingfisher (KF) Airlines are permitted international flights.  At the time of writing KF, due to its financial woes, has stopped operating its international routes.   AI too suffered badly dues to its pilots’ recent 58-day strike.  Foreign airlines, at the moment, operate over 1300 flights a week to India while Indian carriers operate less than 1000.
The decision to curtail the operation of foreign carriers will definitely adversely affect them, especially the Gulf-based ones.  Among these are Qatar Airways, Saudia and Oman Air, all airlines that are keen to expand their Indian operations.  Is this policy good or bad?  In August I had posted three articles, or should I day an article in three parts, on FDI in Civil Aviation.  The same principle with regard to benefit to the Indian economy applies here also.  Let us see how.
Among India’s international airports how many can be termed as international hubs?  Other than Mumbai and Delhi I couldn’t think of any other.  Sorry, Bangalore has not yet earned this tag.  By restricting foreign carriers from entering India, are we going to shake this off?  I feel that current restrictions have, instead of having a favourable effect on the Indian aviation industry, actually have had an adverse effect.  Restrictions placed have prevented other airports from becoming international hubs.  Further, travellers  are given a limited choice resulting in not just higher fares but also huge waitlists.
Dubai and Singapore are today two examples of nations, a fraction of India’s size, that are now truly international hubs.  Would this have happened if these nations had to place restrictions on who should or shouldn’t land there?  And, in both cases, national carriers, Singapore Airlines and Emirates Airways, were huge beneficiaries.  A passenger landing in Dubai and Singapore can take a single flight to almost any major destination in the World.  This has resulted in huge numbers of business and leisure travellers using these airports benefitting not just the airports but the nations’ economies as well.
A study recently conducted by the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) and sponsored by the Dubai headquartered Emirates Airlines (EK) concludes that an efficient civil aviation sector is important for economic growth.  This is because it is inter-linked with other sectors in the economy, generating income and employment through global commerce and tourism.  In the globalised World that we are living today, a well-managed civil aviation infrastructure with efficiently-run, competitive airlines are an absolute must.  With expanding airport infrastructure and more airlines operating, transport and communication costs can come down drastically.  This will lead to the promotion of increased commercial and cultural activity.  The result more jobs, and ultimately unification of people and markets.
According to the sponsors of the study EK, who are keen on increasing their operations into India, the move to increase services of foreign carriers will result in direct as well as indirect benefits for the country.  There are two ways in which this expansion could take place; one, through both higher seat allocation and two, through additional points of service.  Their findings are very interesting.  At a presentation in New Delhi on Monday, SEP 3, 2012, Will Lofberg, Senior Manager, Public and Environment Affairs, said allowing Emirates to operate 80,000 seats a week into India or carry 6.16 million passengers annually would lead to a direct contribution to the Indian economy of $363 million and have a multiplier effect of $720 million.  Below is a chart to show how.   At the moment, this is all the data I have but shall make further comments the moment I get a copy of the report entitled Emirates in India: Assessment of economic impact and regional benefits.

As per the study, allowing EK to operate 60,000 seats a week would allow it to carry 5.03 million passengers annually and directly contribute $296 million to the Indian economy with a multiplier impact of $644 million.  The study, though sponsored by them, has been conducted by NCAER (www.ncaer.org), an independent body.   Imagine what kind of a multiplier effect would take place if India opened up its skies and allowed FDI in domestic aviation.  I’ve always maintained that we should ignore what other countries are doing and follow our own model which is good for our own economy.
Coming back to the presentation Mr. Lofberg mentioned that EK, at the moment, is allowed to operate 54,200 seats a week into India and since 2008, has not been allowed to increase that number.  He also stated that EK’s India operations carried 45 per cent of passengers between 10 Indian cities and Dubai, with the remaining 55 per cent of passenger traffic being carried from Indian airports to points beyond Dubai.  I always maintain that if EK can do it, why not AI or any other Indian carrier?  On the contrary, I feel, that Indian carriers have, with the help of the government, following a dog in the manger attitude.  They are opposed to allowing any more rights to international carriers to operate more flights into India, arguing that foreign airlines carry passengers not only to their home country but also to third countries from their home base.  How exactly should it adversely affect them?
The study states that EK contributed $596 million to the Indian economy by way of $274 million in the air transport sector; $76 million in the petroleum and chemicals sector; $62 million in the manufacturing sector; $39 million in the trade, banking and insurance sector and $145 million in other sectors of the economy.  The Dubai-based airline has provided direct employment to 1,045 employees and supports a total of 72,323 jobs in India through its operations.  On the tourism front, Emirates has brought in 529,928 foreign tourists in India in 2010-11, as a result of which, $1,153 million were contributed to the economy as foreign exchange earnings.
Every $1 contributed by EK to the Indian air transport sector generates an additional $1.176 in the Indian economy, giving an output multiplier for Emirates’ contribution in the Indian economy at 2.176.  EK’s operations have a role in enhancing air transport and tourism as it connects non-hub airports to a significant number of points in India which would otherwise not be directly linked.  If it  expands to four additional destinations in India: Amritsar, Pune, Mangalore and Trichy, apart from 10 cities from where they are operating, it would benefit the Indian economy by $106 million and would also lead to the creation of 13,011 jobs.  The study states that in 2010-11, 65 per cent of the expenditure were on relatively small airports whereas only 35 per cent of Emirates’ direct contribution went to three big airports – Mumbai, Delhi and Chennai (in terms of passenger share). This indicates Emirates’ role in developing economic activities at non-hub points.